Skip to content
Asuruas
Schema type

Place schema

A physical place, location, venue, or geographic entity.

Start reading
Schema type

Place

Choose the type because the page visibly represents the entity—not because the vocabulary happens to provide the class.

Primary topicPlace

A physical place, location, venue, or geographic entity.

Operating outcomeAccountable improvement

Describe real entities and relationships accurately without manufacturing unsupported claims.

Review statusMaintained resource

Reviewed for accuracy, clarity, and operational use.

Entity decision guide

What makes this useful in real operations

01

Use the real context

Apply place to the actual page, template, system, audience, and business purpose instead of copying a generic recommendation.

02

Preserve the decision

Record the evidence, assumptions, owner, implementation reference, and acceptance criteria before the work is released.

03

Verify production output

Check place after deployment and retain the result, remaining limitation, and next review trigger.

Direct answer

What to know about Place

Place is useful when it helps a team make a specific website decision, connect that decision to observable evidence, and define what must be checked after implementation.

  • entity type and page purpose
  • required and recommended properties
  • identifier relationships across the JSON-LD graph
  • agreement between markup and visible content
01

What the type represents

A physical place, location, venue, or geographic entity.

02

Use it when

  • The page represents a place that is not better described by a more specific subtype
  • The location data is visible and accurate
03

Properties to evaluate

  • @id
  • name
  • url
  • address
  • geo
  • map
  • image
04

JSON-LD example

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Place",
  "@id": "https://example.com/locations/example/#place",
  "name": "Example Place",
  "address": {
    "@type": "PostalAddress",
    "addressLocality": "Example City",
    "addressRegion": "WV",
    "addressCountry": "US"
  }
}
05

Common mistakes

  • Selecting the type only because a search feature is desired.
  • Publishing facts that are not visible or supported by the site.
  • Creating conflicting copies of the same entity instead of using a stable @id.
  • Failing to update markup when the visible page or source data changes.
06

Official references

Schema.org defines the vocabulary. Search platforms publish separate documentation for the structured-data features they currently support.

07

Entity fit for Place

Use Place only when the page visibly represents the corresponding entity or relationship. Begin with the page purpose and the entity graph, then select the most specific supported type. Do not let the available vocabulary dictate claims the page does not make.

01

Visible support

Every material property should be supported by visible, current, and accurate page content.

02

Stable identity

Use consistent identifiers when the same organization, person, place, product, service, or webpage appears across the graph.

03

Consumer requirements

Treat Schema.org validity and search-consumer eligibility as related but separate checks.

08

Deployment record for Place

  • Syntax validation, type/property validation, consumer testing, and post-deployment inspection.
  • Record the page template, generator, source fields, responsible owner, and release reference.
  • Avoid publishing properties that are unsupported, hidden, stale, or inconsistent with visible content.
  • Parse the deployed json-ld, validate the graph, compare it with visible content, and test any target consumer requirements.
  • Schedule review when visible content, offers, ownership, locations, products, or consumer documentation changes.
09

Expand the reach of Place

Search visibility and user value improve when place answers the real questions people bring to the page. For business owners, marketers, seo practitioners, and developers, that means covering the decision context, observable signals, implementation boundaries, and proof that the result works in production—not repeating a keyword or publishing a longer version of the same incomplete explanation.

Use the page as part of a connected topic cluster. Link the broad concept to focused implementation guides, definitions, checklists, examples, and the Asuruas workflow that can identify affected URLs. The goal is to help a reader move from discovery to a confident next action while giving search systems clear entities, relationships, and page purpose.

  • Inspect entity type and page purpose.
  • Inspect required and recommended properties.
  • Inspect identifier relationships across the JSON-LD graph.
  • Inspect agreement between markup and visible content.
01

Strengthen the answer

Select the narrowest accurate entity type.

02

Build the topic cluster

Connect organization, website, webpage, and primary entities.

03

Prove the outcome

Validate syntax and eligibility after deployment.

Next useful action

Turn place into an accountable record.

A justified type-selection decision for Place with visible-content support and validation evidence.

Working sequence

Move from question to verified outcome

Use the sequence as a practical operating path. Keep the process proportional to the website, impact, and number of people involved.

  1. 01

    Prepare

    Define the intended outcome, affected scope, dependencies, owner, and rollback path for place.

  2. 02

    Implement

    Make the smallest coherent change and attach it to a ticket, release, or retained work record.

  3. 03

    Quality review

    Check syntax, behavior, accessibility, security, content accuracy, and side effects that apply to the change.

  4. 04

    Release and verify

    Inspect the deployed output, repeat the relevant test, and record the result and follow-up trigger.

Fit and boundaries

Know when to use this—and when to escalate

Use this resource

When you need to make, explain, implement, or verify a concrete decision about place.

Bring these inputs

The actual URL or system, intended audience, source evidence, known constraints, responsible owner, and success criteria.

Retain these outputs

The decision, implementation reference, review result, unresolved limitation, and next maintenance trigger.

Practical questions

Questions teams should answer before closing the work

Account-specific requirements, contracts, and qualified professional review take precedence over general public guidance.

Can Asuruas complete place automatically?

Asuruas can collect and organize many observable signals, but automation does not replace authorization, professional judgment, manual accessibility or security review, legal interpretation, or production change control.

What should be recorded before work starts?

Record the current condition, affected scope, source evidence, intended outcome, owner, dependencies, approval requirements, acceptance criteria, and rollback or recovery path where applicable.

What proves the issue is resolved?

Repeat the relevant test for place, confirm the intended user or system outcome, review material side effects, and retain the result with a date and reviewer.

When should the decision be reviewed again?

Review after a relevant template, release, platform, vendor, legal requirement, business rule, audience, or measurement change—and on the recurring cadence appropriate to the risk.

How can this page reach more qualified visitors?

Answer the specific decisions behind place, demonstrate the evidence a reader should inspect, connect the page to focused resources, and provide a visible next action. Measure qualified engagement and completed workflows instead of traffic alone.

Continue from guidance to evidence

Apply place to a website you are authorized to assess.

Create a free workspace, verify the website, run a bounded audit, and keep the resulting finding connected to remediation and retesting.